Land Bridge Dilemma: Tales from Ranong about Conservation and Development

Land Bridge Dilemma: Tales from Ranong about Conservation and Development

In a heartfelt gathering in Ranong province, villagers, fishermen, and local stakeholders passionately discussed the proposed government land bridge project—a 90km motorway and railway linking the Andaman Sea with the Gulf of Thailand. The project promises economic development, but concerns about environmental damage and community displacement remain prominent.

The meeting, held at the 3rd Mangrove Forest Research Centre, brought together diverse voices including small-scale fishermen like Somjai Yhopkan, who relies on the rich marine life supported by Ranong’s mangrove forests, a UNESCO-designated biosphere reserve since 1997. Somjai, who works daily to sustain her family through fishing, expressed her fears: ‘The sea is my last resource for survival.’

Likewise, local farmers and residents voiced apprehensions about the impact on their land and livelihoods. Durian grower Somchok Jungjaturun highlighted that each mature durian tree yields significant income, which would be compromised if the land for the project is developed. ‘Who wants it? Not me and not our folks,’ he stated.

Environmental advocates and civil society groups, including Beach For Life and the Green South Foundation, have conducted research into the project’s potential impacts. They warn that the development could threaten the mangrove ecosystems and marine biodiversity, which support local communities and attract eco-tourism.

The proposed land bridge is part of a broader plan under the Southern Economic Corridor (SEC) Act, designed to foster economic growth through infrastructure expansion. However, critics argue that the law includes many exemptions, allowing the government to bypass environmental laws and community rights if deemed necessary for the project.

Fisherman Paiboon Sawatnun expressed skepticism: ‘You know the land bridge project tries to give us half-truths about the ports and roads. But actually, it will be followed by industrial estates and refineries.’ He and others fear that the project’s true intent involves industrialization and environmental degradation.

The community’s response was resolute, with many demanding that their voices be respected and that development should not come at the expense of their environment and way of life. Somjai summed up their collective hope: ‘Don’t give us this land bridge project.’

Environmental experts and local residents continue to advocate for sustainable development, emphasizing the importance of preserving the ecosystems that sustain their livelihoods and ensure the region’s natural beauty. As the debate unfolds, the future of Ranong’s landscape and community remains a poignant example of the challenges faced when balancing development with conservation.

Comments are closed